DURATION
1 year
MY ROLE
Senior UX Designer
COMPANY
DSTA
TAGS
UX Design, User Research, Complex Domain System
User Research (Interviews, Focus Groups, Workflow Analysis)
UX/UI Design (Wireframing, Prototyping, Interaction Design)
Design System Development (Ensuring consistency across 8 modules)
The existing CCIS suffered from several critical issues:
Domain-Specific Preferences, No Unified Structure
Each service (air, land, sea) had different ways of inputting, aggregating, and visualising data.
This led to inconsistent reporting, manual workarounds, and difficulty in cross-service collaboration.
Low Engagement & High Training Burden
Since the system was only used twice a year during exercises, users struggled to retain familiarity.
Training was time-consuming, and NSmen often required re-training.
Stovepiped Modules & Data Gaps
Information lived in disconnected modules, forcing staff to manually compile reports.
Command Post data preparation took up to 2 hours before briefings.
Outdated UX Hindering Adoption
The legacy system followed an obsolete design, making interactions unintuitive.
Users expressed frustration with unnecessary complexity.
Impact of These Issues
Delayed decision-making due to manual data reconciliation.
Increased cognitive load for operators juggling multiple tools.
Reduced trust in system accuracy because of inconsistent updates.
How might we design a flexible, modular CCIS that allows different service domain to work in their preferred way while maintaining a single, reliable source of truth for real-time situational awareness?
Based on research, we prioritised:
Unified but Flexible Design – A single system that allowed domain-specific configurations.
Zero Manual Training – Intuitive UI resembling tools users already knew.
Live Data Integration – Eliminating manual updates to improve accuracy.
Modular Interoperability – Ensuring all modules could share data seamlessly.
Process
1. Research Phase
Conducted user interviews & focus groups with operators from all three services.
Mapped existing workflows to identify pain points and inefficiencies.
Performed heuristic evaluations on the legacy system to pinpoint UX flaws.
Key Insight:
Users wanted a system that felt familiar (like commercial dashboards) but could handle complex military data structures.
2. Design Phase
Co-creation workshops with military users to define key features.
Developed a modular design system allowing widgets and dashboards to be customized per domain.
Introduced smart onboarding (interactive tutorials, contextual tooltips) to reduce training needs.
3. Validation Phase
Tested prototypes with 300+ users during mid-year exercises.
Measured usability via SUS & BERT scores.
Gathered qualitative feedback for iterative improvements.